<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mini Speedway RC &#187; Motors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minispeedway.com/category/miniz/motors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minispeedway.com</link>
	<description>Milwaukee Mini-Z RC Racing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 03:50:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>HFAY 70-turn Motor &#8211; On Track Tests</title>
		<link>http://minispeedway.com/2008/06/06/hfay-70-turn-motor-on-track-tests/</link>
		<comments>http://minispeedway.com/2008/06/06/hfay-70-turn-motor-on-track-tests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 19:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mini-Z]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minispeedway.com/2008/06/06/hfay-70-turn-motor-on-track-tests/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PN Racing HFAY 70-turn Motor &#8211; On Track Tests So, the static tests were interesting but it is on the track where differences matter. If you want to cut to the chase&#8230;I love these new motors. They are smooth, responsive and deliver power better than the stock motors. I get more punch out of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PN Racing HFAY 70-turn Motor &#8211; On Track Tests</p>
<p>So, the static tests were interesting but it is on the track where differences matter. If you want to cut to the chase&#8230;I love these new motors. They are smooth, responsive and deliver power better than the stock motors. I get more punch out of the corners and am consistently 7-8 seconds faster than with the stock motor on a 20-lap Time Trial around a track that is slightly bigger than an HFAY 2-L track.</p>
<p>What about that static test data? The Stock Motors get 33,000 plus and the HFAY 70-turn about 24,000. I thought faster was always better. Not so! Under load and in race conditions the HFAY motor accelerates harder and is more tractable. I&#8217;m no motor genius but I can tell you the HFAY motor feels a lot better.</p>
<p>How about that Amp draw? After over 1,000 laps over 3 different cars equipped with the new Season 6 motor no problems with the stock 3010 FETs.</p>
<p>So far I&#8217;ve run about fifty 20-lap time trials with the new motor and about a twenty 20-lap sessions with my Season 5 car with the stock Kyosho Motor. I learned all I need to know there, the new motor is faster.</p>
<p>Next, I swapped the stock motor out for a Season 6 Motor in the old Season 5 Stock car to see how it goes. The chassis are set up slightly differently.</p>
<p>The main differences between the Season 5 car and the new Season 6 Car are:</p>
<p><strong>Motor Mount</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The Season 5 Car has the 3Racing mount so I could use the stock motor.</li>
<li>The New Car has a PN Racing mount necessitating a drilled motor can which the HFAY Spec motor is.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Rear Damper</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The Season 5 Car has the 3Racing damper.</li>
<li>The New Car has a PN Racing damper.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Front Steering Knuckles</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Season 5 Car -.5D PN Front Steering Knuckles and PN Stainless King Pins</li>
<li>New Car -1.0D PN Front Steering Knuckles and PN Stainless King Pins</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Front Springs</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Season 5 Car &#8211; Green Atomic RCP Springs</li>
<li>Season 6 Car &#8211; Yellow Atomic RCP Springs</li>
</ul>
<p>After the swap lap times were about 5 seconds faster over 20 laps in the exact same car. So, the new chassis is set up slightly better for me but the two cars are very close.</p>
<p>For what is is worth, before the tests began, I was able to run faster and more consistent laps with my Season 5 Stock Motor car than with my Season 5 HFAY Spec car. The new Season 6 Car is faster for me than either Season 5 Car. The Spec motor was certainly faster but the consistency of the Stock Motor was better for me in Season 5. I&#8217;d put the new Season 6 Motor somewhere in between the 2 options from last year. It is faster than the stock motor and easier for me to drive than the Season 5 Motor. 7-8 seconds in 2 minutes = 28-32 seconds over an 8-minute OLPS race! That is sweet and should mean I can run 6 more laps that with the stock motor I ran last year during an HFAY race. I&#8217;m looking forward to being more competitive!</p>
<p>So now that I have 2 98mm Ford GTs running very similar lap times I am going to try a 94mm chassis with one of them to see if I can run it faster. I will be converting one of the Ford GTs to a Lexus SC430. I can also test the 350Z body and the Audi A4 but will start with the SC430. More on this in another post!</p>
<p>Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://minispeedway.com/2008/06/06/hfay-70-turn-motor-on-track-tests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HFAY 70-turn Season 6 Spec Motor Tests</title>
		<link>http://minispeedway.com/2008/06/06/hfay-70-turn-season-6-spec-motor-tests/</link>
		<comments>http://minispeedway.com/2008/06/06/hfay-70-turn-season-6-spec-motor-tests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mini-Z]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minispeedway.com/2008/06/06/hfay-70-turn-season-6-spec-motor-tests/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PN Racing HFAY 70-turn Season 6 Spec Motor Tests All motors were broken in on a Much More Platinum Motor Master in Break-in mode. EDIT&#8230; &#8211; GUYS, MY MOTOR MASTER MAY NOT BE WORKING PROPERLY SO THE AMP DRAW READINGS I GOT BELOW ARE PROBABLY NOT ACCURATE SO I REMOVED THEM. THIS IS BASED ON [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PN Racing HFAY 70-turn Season 6 Spec Motor Tests</p>
<p>All motors were broken in on a Much More Platinum Motor Master in Break-in mode.</p>
<p>EDIT&#8230; &#8211; GUYS, MY MOTOR MASTER MAY NOT BE WORKING PROPERLY SO THE AMP DRAW READINGS I GOT BELOW ARE PROBABLY NOT ACCURATE SO I REMOVED THEM. THIS IS BASED ON A COUPLE OF OTHERS TESTING THE MOTORS WITH DIFFERENT EQUIPMENT. READ ON FOR OTHER TESTS.</p>
<p>I HAVE A NEW MOTOR MASTER COMING AND WILL RETEST WHEN I GET IT.</p>
<p>THANKS,</p>
<p>GREG</p>
<p>Step one was done with the HFAY motor on slave mode driven by the master motor on the PN Racing Motor Test Stand.</p>
<p>Low Voltage 1.2<br />
High Voltage 3.5<br />
Profile 1<br />
Duration 8 minutes<br />
Cooling period 2 minutes<br />
2 cycles</p>
<p>Step two was an 8 minute Break-in powering the HFAY motor directly from the Motor Master using the following settings</p>
<p>Low Voltage 1.2<br />
High Voltage 3.5<br />
Profile 2<br />
Duration 8 minutes<br />
1 cycle</p>
<p>The bushings were oiled at the beginning and end of the break-in runs. Additionally a drop of VooDoo fluid was used before the powered break-in.</p>
<p><strong>#1 HFAY 70-turn Spec Motor</strong><br />
4.8v RPM 23,730</p>
<p><strong>#2 HFAY 70-turn Spec Motor<br />
</strong>4.8v RPM 24,300</p>
<p><strong>#3 HFAY 70-turn Spec Motor</strong><br />
4.8v RPM 24,180</p>
<p><strong>#4 HFAY 70-turn Spec Motor</strong><br />
4.8v RPM 23,730</p>
<p><strong>#5 HFAY 70-turn Spec Motor</strong><br />
4.8v RPM 24,750</p>
<p>For Comparison my Season 5 Spec motor delivered the following after I removed it from my back up car. For what it is worth I never used this motor in actual HFAY races. It was certainly faster than the stock motor I ran but I was not as consistent and ran a lap or two less over 8-minute tests.</p>
<p><strong>Season 5 HFAY Spec Motor</strong><br />
4.8v RPM 36,960<br />
.95 Peak Amp draw<br />
.92 Average 4 step (1.2v, 2.4v, 3.6v, 4.8v) Amps</p>
<p>And a couple of <strong>Kyosho Stock </strong>motors I used over Season 5.</p>
<p>4.8v RPM 33,800<br />
2.55 Peak Amp draw<br />
.85 Average 4 step (1.2v, 2.4v, 3.6v, 4.8v) Amps</p>
<p>4.8v RPM 32,350<br />
2.93 Peak Amp draw<br />
1.17 Average 4 step (1.2v, 2.4v, 3.6v, 4.8v) Amps</p>
<p>Now, on to the track tests!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://minispeedway.com/2008/06/06/hfay-70-turn-season-6-spec-motor-tests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mini Speedway Kyosho Stock Motor Cleaning Test</title>
		<link>http://minispeedway.com/2008/02/24/mini-speedway-kyosho-stock-motor-cleaning-test/</link>
		<comments>http://minispeedway.com/2008/02/24/mini-speedway-kyosho-stock-motor-cleaning-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Motors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minispeedway.com/2008/02/24/mini-speedway-kyosho-stock-motor-cleaning-test/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is from a post I started at Mini-Z Racer Forum in which I test the effectiveness of cleaning Mini-Z motors. Motor 1 This is a stock Kyosho motor that came with my Ford GT Ready set. This was the first Mini-Z I got last year and I ran the heck out of it. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is from a post I started at Mini-Z Racer Forum in which I test the effectiveness of cleaning Mini-Z motors.</p>
<p><strong>Motor 1</strong></p>
<p>This is a stock Kyosho motor that came with my Ford GT Ready set. This was the first Mini-Z I got last year and I ran the heck out of it. I don&#8217;t know how much time but I am guessing 100-plus 5 minute Time Trials maybe more and possibly a lot more.</p>
<p>In the beginning I broke the motor in by running it on a single AA cell for about 30 minutes. After that, besides oiling the bushings every few runs and an occasional drop of comm fluid, I didn&#8217;t do anything to it.</p>
<p>When I took it out of the car it was running 29,500 at 4.8V on the Much More Motor Master.</p>
<p>I cleaned it with Dynamite Magnum Force 2 Electric Motor Cleaner by first spraying it and then swishing it around in a  baby food jar with Motor Cleaner in it. Then I blew it out with canned air and let it dry. I then relubed the bushings and broke it in again in CTX mode on the Motor Master for 3 x 10 minute cycles with the voltage varying between 1.5 and 3v with a rest of 5 minutes in between break in runs.</p>
<p>I tested the motor immediately after the break in and got  31,450 RPM at 4.8V out of it.</p>
<p>I then relubed the bushings and added a drop of comm fluid ran it again and found 33,650 at 4.8V pulling about 1.6 amps!</p>
<p>Not bad overall. I got 4,150 more RPM for cleaning and relubing this bad boy.</p>
<p><strong>Motor 2</strong></p>
<p>This is another stock Kyosho MR-02 Readyset motor</p>
<p>I already had the Much More Motor Master when I started using this motor and ran a CTX break-in procedure. I forget the exact voltage settings but I think it was 1v to 2v varying about every 2 seconds. I know it ran 3 x 10 minute cycles with 5 minutes in between each set. I don&#8217;t remember the exact steps but in the end it was a freshly lubed and comm dropped final run that saw 34,500 RPM from the new motor.</p>
<p>This one I only ran about 20 x 5-minute Time Trails and right out of the car it ran 33,480 at 4.8V.</p>
<p>After cleaning, relubing and hitting it with comm drops and running the 3 x 10 1.5V to 3V break in it ran exactly 1,000 rpm more, 34,480 at 4.8V. Close enough to when it was new that the variation can be tossed.</p>
<p>So, this one after pretty much the same cleaning procedure as #1 saw 830 more RPM. How long each will maintain its performance is another question since Motor #1 has so much more time on it.</p>
<p><strong>Not Very Scientific Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>This is obviously not a very scientific test but I&#8217;d suspect that Motor #1 was about as bad as a stock motor gets since it was my first one and I had not really done any maintenance except to lube it occasionally. Motor #2 was better prepared and cared for as I used it and it had not run anywhere as much so the performance degradation had not really set in.</p>
<p><strong>Here is what I know so far:</strong></p>
<p>It is obvious that cleaning helps. I am trying to determine how often to do it. I am thinking every 2 hours of run time.</p>
<p>Lubing the bushing is very important. Every other run. Maybe every third. For me a run is usually 5 minutes.</p>
<p>Comm Drops do make a difference although I am not sure for how long. Seems like about 2 or 3 minutes but there may be some longer term benefits like better bushing seating or wear.</p>
<p>More to come as I learn.</p>
<p><!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/mini-z" rel="tag">mini-z</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://minispeedway.com/2008/02/24/mini-speedway-kyosho-stock-motor-cleaning-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

